ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Chief Judge (scoring) - Suna Brunnemer - GER

Ranking Index = 6.24
 8. Bayern DoSi 2024, Pegnitz EDQZ, 14.-15.09.2024
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Advanced - Glider, P2 ADG Unknown #1
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Posi No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 P001 8.0 5.5 7.0 5.0 5.0 0 555.49 2 -1
    ASK 21 D-3868 8.41 5.83 7.37 4.66 5.32   555.34    
2 P006 7.0 8.0 5.5 7.5 5.0 0 560.55 1 +1
    ASK 21 D-3868 7.16 8.39 5.83 7.79 5.32   560.39    
3 P014 5.5 7.0 4.0 7.0 4.5 0 458.74 5 -2
    ASK 21 D-2310 5.29 7.37 5.02 7.16 4.80   482.95    
4 P005 5.0 5.0 7.0 6.5 4.5 0 518.62 3 +1
    ASK 21 D-2310 4.66 5.32 7.37 6.54 4.80   518.54    
5 P009 6.0 6.5 5.0 7.0 3.5 0 478.04 4 +1
    ASK 21 D-3868 5.91 6.85 5.32 7.16 3.78   478.03    
6 P008 6.5 6.0 4.0 5.5 5.0 0 445.60 7 -1
    ASK 21 D-3868 6.54 6.34 4.29 5.29 5.32   445.65    
7 P017 5.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 5.0 0 408.93 8 -1
    ASK 21 D-2310 4.66 5.83 4.29 4.66 5.32   409.04    
8 P016 6.0 7.0 5.0 5.5 3.0 0 454.51 6 +2
    ASK 21 D-3868 5.91 7.37 5.32 5.29 3.26   439.28    
9 P003 HZ 5.0 4.5 6.0 4.0 0 362.86 9
    ASK 21 D-2310 CHZ 5.32 4.80 5.91 4.29   363.06    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0   10
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 12 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

 
 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

   Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 5.67, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.16 Panel average mark = 5.80, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.43
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Tim Urbany - H/C ASK 21 439.28 -   430.45 8.83     6     8     + 2     2.36 37.80%
Jules Mathay - H/C ASK 21 482.95 -   509.29 26.34     5     3     - 2     2.23 35.70%
Felix Bäder - H/C ASK 21 409.04 -   444.25 35.21     8     7     - 1     0.58 9.20%
Bastian Schuster - H/C ASK 21 518.54 -   507.60 10.94     3     4     + 1     0.39 6.30%
Lars Reinhold - H/C ASK 21 560.39 -   543.66 16.73     1     2     + 1     0.38 6.00%
Thorsten Schneider - H/C ASK 21 555.34 -   559.94 4.60     2     1     - 1     0.16 2.60%
Martin Tesch - H/C ASK 21 445.65 -   462.56 16.91     7     6     - 1     0.14 2.20%
Martin Michaelis - H/C ASK 21 478.03 -   486.03 8.00     4     5     + 1     0.01 0.20%
                  6.24    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Timo Wellenhöfer - H/C ASK 21 363.06   382.14 19.08     9     9            
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 16.08.24