ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 2:  Schorsch Dörder - GER

Ranking Index = 3.06

 8. Bayern DoSi 2024, Pegnitz EDQZ, 14.-15.09.2024
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Advanced - Glider, P2 ADG Unknown #1
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Posi No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 P001 7.5 6.5 7.0 5.0 5.0 0 557.31 1
    ASK 21 D-3868 7.50 6.68 7.28 5.56 4.91   562.52    
2 P006 6.5 7.5 6.0 7.5 5.0 0 547.60 2
    ASK 21 D-3868 6.72 7.87 6.09 7.50 4.91   552.18    
3 P014 5.0 7.0 6.0 6.5 5.0 0 516.57 3
    ASK 21 D-2310 5.56 7.28 6.09 6.72 4.91   519.15    
4 P005 1.0 6.5 6.0 6.5 5.0 0 471.55 5 -1
    ASK 21 D-2310 3.55 6.68 6.09 6.72 4.91   485.30    
5 P009 5.5 5.0 6.5 7.0 4.5 0 505.75 4 +1
    ASK 21 D-3868 5.94 4.91 6.68 7.11 4.31   507.63    
6 P008 6.5 5.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 0 434.79 7 -1
    ASK 21 D-3868 6.72 5.50 4.31 5.56 4.91   432.08    
7 P017 5.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 0 433.68 8 -1
    ASK 21 D-2310 5.56 7.28 3.72 6.33 4.91   430.90    
8 P016 4.5 6.5 5.5 5.0 3.0 0 435.09 6 +2
    ASK 21 D-3868 5.17 6.68 5.50 5.56 2.54   432.41    
9 P003 HZ 5.5 5.0 6.0 4.5 0 374.12 9
    ASK 21 D-2310 CHZ 5.50 4.91 6.33 4.31   367.50    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0   6
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

13 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

- -  

 

 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

  Judge 2 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 5.59, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.57 Panel average mark = 5.80, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2.43
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score
Bias
Hi/Lo
Panel
FPS score
Score
difference
Judge
FPS rank
Panel
FPS rank
Rank
diff'ce
RI value
per pilot
Percent
of total
  RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Tim Urbany - H/C ASK 21 432.41 -   430.45 1.96     6     8     + 2     0.86 28.20%
Bastian Schuster - H/C ASK 21 485.30 -   507.60 22.30     5     4     - 1     0.85 27.90%
Martin Michaelis - H/C ASK 21 507.63 -   486.03 21.60     4     5     + 1     0.68 22.10%
Martin Tesch - H/C ASK 21 432.08 -   462.56 30.48     7     6     - 1     0.60 19.60%
Felix Bäder - H/C ASK 21 430.90 -   444.25 13.35     8     7     - 1     0.07 2.20%
                  3.06    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score
  Panel
FPS score
Score
difference
Judge
FPS rank
Panel
FPS rank
       
Thorsten Schneider - H/C ASK 21 562.52   559.94 2.58     1     1            
Lars Reinhold - H/C ASK 21 552.18   543.66 8.52     2     2            
Jules Mathay - H/C ASK 21 519.15   509.29 9.86     3     3            
Timo Wellenhöfer - H/C ASK 21 367.50   382.14 14.64     9     9            
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 16.08.24